Publications

New York Law Journal June 28, 2011 TuesdaySECTION: EXPERT ANALYSIS; Pg. p.3, col.1 Vol. 245 No. 123 LENGTH: 1781 wordsHEADLINE: Good as Gold: Using Analogies And Short Stories in Summation; TRIAL ADVOCACY BYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz And Evan TorganBODY:The task for trial lawyers in delivering a powerful summation requires them to find a way to captivate...

New York Law Journal April 25, 2011 MondaySECTION: EXPERT ANALYSIS; Pg. 3 Vol. 245 No. 78 LENGTH: 2618 wordsHEADLINE: Dealing With Damages In Voir Dire and Summation; TRIAL ADVOCACYBYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz And Evan TorganBODY:In any personal injury case, a victory is a Pyrrhic one, unless the plaintiff receives all the damages he is entitled to...

New York Law Journal February 28, 2011 MondaySECTION: EXPERT ANALYSIS; Pg. p.3, col.1 Vol. 245 No. 38 LENGTH: 1872 wordsHEADLINE: Using the Internet As a Tool for Cross-Examination; TRIAL ADVOCACYBYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz And Evan TorganBODY:For those who are unaware, there is a new saying in the electronic age, clearly reminiscent of a Miranda right: "Anything...

New York Law Journal December 28, 2010 TuesdaySECTION: EXPERT ANALYSIS; Pg. p.3, col.1 Vol. 244 No. 123 LENGTH: 1511 wordsHEADLINE: Common Mistakes On Direct Examination; TRIAL ADVOCACYBYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz And Evan TorganBODY:While many trial lawyers focus on the excitement and challenge of a strong cross examination, these same lawyers often overlook the importance of a...

New York Law Journal November 1, 2010 MondaySECTION: EXPERT ANALYSIS; Pg. p.3, col.1 Vol. 244 No. 85 LENGTH: 1899 wordsHEADLINE: Proving Your Case Through Adverse Witnesses; TRIAL ADVOCACY BYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz And Evan TorganBODY:The best way to prove your case to a jury is often through the mouths of the enemy. Most jurors will expect...